The CSS2 specification specification defines which media groups that each CSS property applies to. It does so by aggregating the various media types by function and form
Interface
Description: This category describes the way a user experiences the entirety of a document with a given Media type.
Options:
Continuous - The document is experienced using a movable window/portal on the content with the Media type.
Paged - The document is experienced a page at a time with the Media type.
Both - CSS properties are applied using either continuous or
Excerpted from "Status of this Document" and "Introduction" sections: "Comments during the SMIL review period suggested that the relationship between SMIL and CSS should be more clearly explained. This note provides a detailed explanation of the relationship between SMIL layout and CSS. It updates a Note from June 15. Most changes are editorial. A section on mapping z-index values from SMIL basic layout to CSS has been added."
"SMIL basic layout has a few multimedia-related options that the initially text-based CSS does not cover yet. These will be
Abstract
"Ruby" are short runs of text alongside the base text, typically used in East Asian documents to indicate pronunciation or to provide a short annotation. This document proposes a set of CSS properties associated with the 'Ruby' elements. They can be used in combination with the Ruby elements of HTML [RUBY].
Status of This Document
This specification is one of the "modules" for the upcoming CSS level 3 (CSS3) specification. It has been developed by the CSS Working Group which is part of the Style activity (see summary). It contains
Introduction
If you are a web designer or front-end developer, you are probably familiar with how different browsers or user agents displays your code in their own way. Picture this: You are pushing pixels and refining your designs so it fits perfect in your Firefox browser, but when presenting your design to the client in Internet Explorer, your pages might brake completely. Bye bye contract. Designing with CSS is no exception. On the contrary – table based layout seems to be more cross-browser consistent than CSS positioning. This probably one of